UMR CNRS 7253

Outils du site


fr:biblioidebreiefs

Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

Lien vers cette vue comparative

Les deux révisions précédentesRévision précédente
Prochaine révision
Révision précédente
fr:biblioidebreiefs [2016/04/11 17:36] dlourdeafr:biblioidebreiefs [2016/04/13 11:45] (Version actuelle) dlourdea
Ligne 1: Ligne 1:
 ====== Références Bibliographiques - Projet I-DEBRIEFS - 2016 ====== ====== Références Bibliographiques - Projet I-DEBRIEFS - 2016 ======
  
-Allal, L., & Saada-Robert, M. (1992). La métacognition : cadre conceptuel pour l’étude des régulations en situation scolaire. Archives de Psychologie, 60, 265-296. 
-  
-Anastassova, M. (2006). L'analyse ergonomique des besoins en amont de la conception de technologies émergente: le cas de la Réalité Augmentée pour la formation à la maintenance automobile. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris 5, Paris.  
  
-BaccinoT., Bellino, C., & Colombi, T. (2005). Mesure de l'utilisabilité des interfacesParis: Hermès Sciences.+AllalL. (1991). Vers une pratique de l'évaluation formative: matériel de formation continue des enseignantsDe Boeck Supérieur.
  
-BrangierE., & BastienJ. M. C. (2006). L'analyse de l'activité est-elle suffisante et/ou pertinente pour innover dans le domaine des nouvelles technologies? In GValléry & R. Amalberti (Eds.)L'analyse du travail en perspectives: influences et évolutions (pp. 143-156). Toulouse: Octarès.+AllalL., & Saada-Robert, M. (1992). La métacognition : cadre conceptuel pour l’étude des régulations en situation scolaireArchives de Psychologie60, 265-296
  
-BuisineS. (2005). Conception et évaluation d'agents conversationnels multimodaux bidirectionnels. (Doctorat), Université Paris 5, Paris. +AssaillyJ. P. (2008). Recherches et pratiques éducatives innovantes (matrice GDEpour l'accès au permis de conduire en Europe. Rapport INRETS contrat DSCR, Paris (124 p).
  
-CarrollM., FuchsS., HaleK., DargueB., Buck, B. (2010). Advanced Training Evaluation System: Leveraging Neuro-physiological Measurement to Individualize TrainingThe Interservice/Industry TrainingSimulation & Education Conference (I/ITSEC)2010. [[http://ntsa.metapress.com/link.asp?id=f822052381327663]]+BoccaraV., Vidal-GomelC., RogalskiJ., & DelhommeP. (2014). Concevoir des référentiels comme des outils pour les formateurs? Réflexions à partir de la formation initiale à la conduite automobileRéférentielCompétences, Développement, 119-132.
  
-ChoquetC., & IksalS. (2007). Modélisation et construction de traces d’utilisation d’une activité   d’apprentissage : une approche langage pour la réingénierie d’un EIAH. Revue des Sciences et Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication pour l’Education et la Formation      (STICEF)14, 1-24.+BurkhardtJ.-M., Bardy, B. LourdeauxD. (2003). Immersion, réalisme et présence dans la conception et l’évaluation des environnements virtuels. Psychologie Française. 4835-42
  
-ClotY., Faïta, D., Fernandez, G., & Scheller, L. (2000). Entretiens en autoconfrontation croisée une méthode en clinique de l'activité. Pistes, 2(1).+BurkhardtJ.-M., Lourdeaux, D., & Mellet d'Huart, D. (2006). La réalité virtuelle pour l'apprentissage humain. In P. Fuchs, G. MoreauB. Arnaldi PGuitton (Eds.), Le Traité de la Réalité Virtuelle (Vol4), pp 43-102. ParisPresses de l'Ecole des Mines de Paris.
  
-DahlbäckN., JönssonA., & AhrenbergL. (1993). Wizard-of-Oz studieswhy and howPaper presented at the IUI'93.+CarrollM., FuchsS., HaleK., Dargue, B., Buck, B. (2010). Advanced Training Evaluation System: Leveraging Neuro-physiological Measurement to Individualize Training. The Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation & Education Conference (I/ITSEC). 2010. http://ntsa.metapress.com/link.asp?id=f822052381327663 
  
-DeckerS., FeyM., Sideras, S., Caballero, S., Rockstraw, L. (R.), Boese, T., Franklin, A. E., Gloe,  D., LioceL., Sando, C. R., Meakim, C., & BorumJ. C. (2013, June). Standards of Best   PracticeSimulation Standard VI: The debriefing processClinical Simulation in Nursing9(6), 27-29. [[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.008]]+ClotY., Faïta, D., FernandezG., & SchellerL. (2000). Entretiens en autoconfrontation croisée une méthode en clinique de l'activitéPistes2(1). 
  
-DehaisF(2004)Conflits dans les activités de pilotageMémoire de doctoratÉcole nationale supérieure de l’aéronautique et de l’espace (SupAéro).+CrandallB., Klein, GA., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). Working minds: A practitioner's guide to cognitive task analysis. Mit Press
  
-DieckmannP(2009)Simulation settings for learning in acute medical careIn P. Dieckmann   (Ed.), Using simulations for education, training and research (pp40-138)Lengerich, Germany: Pabst.+DahlbäckN., Jönsson, A., & Ahrenberg, L. (1993). Wizard-of-Oz studies: why and howPaper presented at the IUI'93
  
-DieckmannP., Friis, S.M., Lippert, A., & Ostergaard, D. (2012)Goalssuccess factorsand   barriers for simulation-based learning a qualitative interview study in health care. Simulation & Gaming43(5), 627-647.+DeckerS., Fey, M., Sideras, S., Caballero, S., Rockstraw, L. (R.), Boese, T., Franklin, A. E., Gloe, D., Lioce, L., SandoC. R., Meakim, C., & Borum, J. C. (2013, June). Standards of Best PracticeSimulation Standard VI: The debriefing processClinical Simulation in Nursing9(6), 27-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.008 
  
-DismukesR.K., Gaba, D.M., & Howard, S.K. (2006). So many roads : facilitated debriefing in healtcare. Simul Healthcare, 1, 23-25.+DehaisF(2004)Conflits dans les activités de pilotageMémoire de doctoratÉcole nationale supérieure de l’aéronautique et de l’espace (SupAéro). 
  
-Dismukes R and Smith GFacilitation and debriefing in aviation training and operationsAldershot; UK: Ashgate2000.+Dieckmann, P(2009). Simulation settings for learning in acute medical care. In P. Dieckmann (Ed.), Using simulations for education, training and research (pp40-138). LengerichGermany: Pabst
  
-DreifuerstKT(2015May)Getting started with debriefing for meaningful learningClinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(5), 268-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.01.005. +DieckmannP., Friis, S.M., Lippert, A., & Ostergaard, D. (2012). Goalssuccess factors, and barriers for simulation-based learning a qualitative interview study in health careSimulation Gaming43(5), 627-647
-Eyssautier-Bavay, C., Ollagnier-BeldameM. (2006). Médiatiser la prise de conscience   métacognitive en contextes d’apprentissage. Rencontres Jeunes Chercheurs en EIAH64-71.+
  
-Georgeon O.Mille A., Bellet B.T., Mathern B.RitterFSupporting activity modelling from activity tracesExpert Systems 29(3pp261-2752012.+DismukesR.K., Gaba, D.M., & HowardS.K. (2006). So many roads : facilitated debriefing in healtcareSimul Healthcare, 1, 23-25
  
-Georgeon O., Henning M.J., Bellet B.T., Mille A. Creating Cognitive Models from Activity AnalysisA Knowledge Engineering Approach to Car Driver Modeling. International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Ann Arbor, Michigan. pp. 43-48. 2007.+Dismukes R and Smith G(2000)Facilitation and debriefing in aviation training and operationsAldershot; UKAshgate
  
-Granry JC, Moll MC. Rapport de mission. État de l’art (national et international) en matière de pratiques de simulation dans le domaine de la santé. Dans le cadre du développement professionnel continu (DPC) et de la prévention des risques associés aux soins. Saint-Denis La Plaine: HAS; 2012.                 +Dreifuerst, K. T. (2015, May). Getting started with debriefing for meaningful learning. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(5), 268-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.01.005.  
-Hale, K. and Breaux, R. (2011). Enhancing Pilot Training with Advanced Measurement Techniques. Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2011, Volume 6781/2011, 540-545. http://www.springerlink.com/content/b5q78365p0625868/ + 
-http://www.humanfactors.uiuc.edu/Reports&PapersPDFs/isap01/proced01.pdf +Eppich, W., & Cheng, A. (2015). Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simulation in Healthcare, 10(2), 106-115. 
-Hogg, J. M. (2002). Debriefing: A means to increasing recovery and subsequent performance. In Kellemann (Ed.), Enhancing recovery: Preventing underperformance in athletes (pp. 181-198). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. + 
-Hogg, J. M. (1998). The post performance debriefing process: Getting your capable track and field athletes to the next level of performance. IAAF quarterly, 3, 49-57. +Eyssautier-Bavay, C., & Ollagnier-Beldame, M. (2006). Médiatiser la prise de conscience métacognitive en contextes d’apprentissage. Rencontres Jeunes Chercheurs en EIAH, 64-71.  
-Long, C. (2011). Future Training – The Boeing Way. The Journal of Civil Aviation Training. CAT Issue 4/2011. 2011. http://halldale.com/magazines/cat/issues/cat-42011 + 
-MacquetAC., Ferrand, C., & Stanton, N. A. (2015). Divide and rule: A qualitative analysis of the debriefing process in elite team sports. Applied Ergonomics, 51, 30-38. doi10.1016/japergo.2015.04005. +Gadget, R. (1999). Formation et évaluation du conducteur, obtention du permis de conduire. vers une gestion théoriquement fondée du risque routier des jeunes conducteurs. Stephan Siegrist (ed.). 
-Matessa, M. and Remington, R. (2005). Eye Movements in Human Performance Modelling of Space Shuttle Operations. Human factors and ergonomics society 49th annual meeting. 2005. http://isis.arc.nasa.gov/publications/Matessa_HFES2005.pdf + 
-McArdle, S., Martin, D., & Lennon, A. (2010). Exploring debriefing in sports: A qualitative perspective. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22, 320-332. doi: 10.1080/10413200.2010.4811566 +Georgeon O., Mille A., Bellet B.T., Mathern B., Ritter F. (. 2012) Supporting activity modelling from activity traces. Expert Systems 29(3), 261-275.  
-Mille, A., & Prié, Y. (2006). Une théorie de la trace informatique pour faciliter l’adaptation dans la confrontation logique d’utilisation/logique de conception. Journées Rochebrune, 1-13. + 
-Mollo, V., & Falzon, P. (2004). Auto-and allo-confrontation as tools for reflective activities. Applied ergonomics, 35(6), 531-540. +Georgeon O., Henning M.J., Bellet B.T., Mille A. (2007) Creating Cognitive Models from Activity Analysis: A Knowledge Engineering Approach to Car Driver Modeling. International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Ann Arbor, Michigan. pp. 43-48.  
-Mollo, V., & Nascimento, A. (sous presse). Pratiques réflexives et développement des individus, des collectifs, et des organisations. In P. Falzon (Ed.), Ergonomie constructive (Vol. 164-175). Paris: PUF.  + 
-Nelson, J. (2011). Contribution à l'analyse prospective des usages dans les projets d'innovation. Thèse de doctorat, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, Paris.  +HAS (2012)/ Granry J.C., Moll, M.,C. Rapport de mission. État de l’art (national et international) en matière de pratiques de simulation dans le domaine de la santé. Dans le cadre du développement professionnel continu (DPC) et de la prévention des risques associés aux soins. Saint-Denis La Plaine: HAS; 2012.  
-Nelson, J., Buisine, S., & Aoussat, A. (sous presse). Fostering creativity in the definition of future product use : a framework to assist user centered design and innovation. Applied Ergonomics. + 
-Ollagnier-Beldame, M. (2006). Distributed cognition in a collaborative and mediated learning    situation. ICAP, Athens. +Hale, K. and Breaux, R. (2011). Enhancing Pilot Training with Advanced Measurement Techniques. Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6781, 540-545. http://www.springerlink.com/content/b5q78365p0625868/ http://www.humanfactors.uiuc.edu/Reports&PapersPDFs/isap01/proced01.pdf  
-Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. New York: Scribner. + 
-Optical Crew Resource Analyzer – http://www.deltaplan.ro/crm-training/ocra.html +Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational  Research, 77, 81–112. 
-Rall, M., Manser, T.,  Howard, K.S.  (2000) Key elements of debriefing for simulator training Volume 17, Issue 8, August 2000, 516–517.                                                                                                                +Higelé, P., Sieffer, N., & Hernja, G. (2011). Analyse qualitative des pratiques pédagogiques des enseignants de la conduite et de l’effet de l’expérience du métier. Recherche Transports Sécurité-RTS, 27(1), 19-33. 
-Rees, T., Freeman, P., Bell, S., & Bunney, R. (2012). Three generalizability studies of the components of perceived HC support. Journal of Sport and Exercise and Psychology, 34(2), 238-251.  + 
-Remolina, E., Ramachandran, S., Fu D., Stottler, D. et Howse, W. R. (2004) Intelligent Simulation-Based Tutor for Flight Training. Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC). 2004. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA439800 +Hogg, J. M. (2002). Debriefing: A means to increasing recovery and subsequent performance. In Kellemann (Ed.), Enhancing recovery: Preventing underperformance in athletes (pp. 181-198). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.  
-Robert, J. M., & Brangier, E. (2012). Prospective ergonomics: origin, goal, and prospects. Work, 41, 5235-5242. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0012-5235 + 
-Romero, M., Usart, M., & Ott, M. (2014). Can serious games contribute to developing and      sustaining 21st Century skills? Games and Culture, 10(2), 148-177. +Hogg, J. M. (1998). The post performance debriefing process: Getting your capable track and field athletes to the next level of performance. IAAF quarterly, 3, 49-57.  
-Rudolph, J.W., Simon, R., Raemer, D.B., & Eppich, W.J. (2008). Debriefing as formative         assessment: closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med, 15(11), 1010-       1016. + 
-Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Hamstra SJ. (2005) Barriers to the use of simulation-based education. Can J Anesth 2005;52 944–950.                                                                                                       +LedermanL. C. (1983). Differential learning outcomes in an instructional simulation: Exploring the relationship between designated role and perceived learning outcomeCommunication Quarterly31(4), 266-270.
-Scherer LA, Chang MC, Meredith JW, et al: Videotape review leads to rapid and sustained learning. Am J Surg 2003;185:516–520. +
-SchönD. (1993). Le praticien réflexif. Montréal: Logiques. +
-Thatcher DCRobinson MJ (1985) An introduction to games and simulations in education. Hants: Solent Simulations. +
-Thomsonfly (2009). Talk by Captain Colin Budenberg« What Pilots Really See Eye Tracking for Simulator Debrief »Recognizing the Potential of Human Factors, a conference of the Training in the Rail & Aviation Industries, Rail & Aviation Standing Group of the Royal Aeronautical Society Human Factors Committee and the Rail Safety & Standards Board. London, 21 May 2009. +
-Weirauch, C. (2011). Advanced IOS Capabilities. The Journal of Civil Aviation Training. CAT Issue 4/2011. 2011. http://halldale.com/magazines/cat/issues/cat-42011 +
-  +
- +
    
 +Lederman, L. C. (1992). Debriefing: Toward a systematic assessment of theory and practice. Simulation & gaming, 23(2), 145-160.
 +Long, C. (2011). Future Training – The Boeing Way. The Journal of Civil Aviation Training. CAT Issue 4/2011. 2011. http://halldale.com/magazines/cat/issues/cat-42011 
  
 +Macquet, A. - C., Ferrand, C., & Stanton, N. A. (2015). Divide and rule: A qualitative analysis of the debriefing process in elite team sports. Applied Ergonomics, 51, 30-38. doi: 10.1016/japergo.2015.04005. 
 +
 +Matessa, M. and Remington, R. (2005). Eye Movements in Human Performance Modelling of Space Shuttle Operations. Human factors and ergonomics society 49th annual meeting. 2005. http://isis.arc.nasa.gov/publications/Matessa_HFES2005.pdf 
 +
 +McArdle, S., Martin, D., & Lennon, A. (2010). Exploring debriefing in sports: A qualitative perspective. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22, 320-332. doi: 10.1080/10413200.2010.4811566 
 +
 +Michon, J. A. (1985). A critical view of driver behavior models: what do we know, what should we do?. In Human behavior and traffic safety (pp. 485-524). 
 +
 +Mille, A., & Prié, Y. (2006). Une théorie de la trace informatique pour faciliter l’adaptation dans la confrontation logique d’utilisation/logique de conception. Journées Rochebrune, 1-13. 
 +
 +Mollo, V., & Falzon, P. (2004). Auto-and allo-confrontation as tools for reflective activities. Applied ergonomics, 35(6), 531-540. 
 +
 +Mundutéguy, C. (2011). A Contribution to Situation Awareness Analysis: Understanding how mismatched expectations affect road safety. Human Factors, 0018720811420841.
 +
 +Nelson, J., Buisine, S., & Aoussat, A. (sous presse). Fostering creativity in the definition of future product use : a framework to assist user centered design and innovation. Applied Ergonomics. 
 +
 +Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. New York: Scribner. 
 +Optical Crew Resource Analyzer – http://www.deltaplan.ro/crm-training/ocra.html 
 +
 +Pastré, P. (2007). Quelques réflexions sur l’organisation de l’activité enseignante. Recherche et formation, (56), 81-93.
 +Rall, M., Manser, T., Howard, K.S. (2000) Key elements of debriefing for simulator training Volume 17, Issue 8, August 2000, 516–517. 
 +
 +Rees, T., Freeman, P., Bell, S., & Bunney, R. (2012). Three generalizability studies of the components of perceived HC support. Journal of Sport and Exercise and Psychology, 34(2), 238-251. 
 +
 +Remolina, E., Ramachandran, S., Fu D., Stottler, D. et Howse, W. R. (2004) Intelligent Simulation-Based Tutor for Flight Training. Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC). 2004. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA439800 
 +
 +Reuchlin, M. (1977). Psychologie, Paris PUF.
 +
 +Romero, M., Usart, M., & Ott, M. (2014). Can serious games contribute to developing and sustaining 21st Century skills? Games and Culture, 10(2), 148-177. 
 +
 +Rudolph, J.W., Simon, R., Raemer, D.B., & Eppich, W.J. (2008). Debriefing as formative ssessment: closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med, 15(11), 1010- 1016. 
 +
 +Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Hamstra SJ. (2005) Barriers to the use of simulation-based education. Can J Anesth 2005;52 944–950. 
 +
 +Scherer LA, Chang MC, Meredith JW, et al: Videotape review leads to rapid and sustained learning. Am J Surg 2003;185:516–520. 
 +
 +Schön, D. (1993). Le praticien réflexif. Montréal: Logiques. 
 +
 +Thatcher DC, Robinson MJ (1985) An introduction to games and simulations in education. Hants: Solent Simulations. 
 +
 +Thomsonfly (2009). Talk by Captain Colin Budenberg« What Pilots Really See - Eye Tracking for Simulator Debrief ». Recognizing the Potential of Human Factors, a conference of the Training in the Rail & Aviation Industries, Rail & Aviation Standing Group of the Royal Aeronautical Society Human Factors Committee and the Rail Safety & Standards Board. London, 21 May 2009. 
 +
 +Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2013). Understanding feedback: A learning theory perspective. Educational Research Review, 9, 1-15.
 +
 +Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C., & Eggen, T. J. (2015). Effects of Feedback in a Computer-Based Learning Environment on Students’ Learning Outcomes A Meta-Analysis. Review of educational research, 85(4), 475-511.    
 +
 +Vermersch, P. (1996). L'explicitation de l'action. Cahiers de linguistique sociale, (28-29), 113-119.
 +VTI (2003)/ Engströme, I., Gregersen, N. P., Hernetkoski, K., Keskinen, E., & Nyberg, A. (2003). Jeunes Conducteurs Novices, Éducation and Formation du Conducteur. Etude Bibliographique. Linköping, Sweden: Swedish National Road and Transport Institute.
 +Weirauch, C. (2011). Advanced IOS Capabilities. The Journal of Civil Aviation Training. CAT Issue 4/2011. 2011. http://halldale.com/magazines/cat/issues/cat-42011
  

Outils pour utilisateurs